panamalaw.org
is our skype name
Yahoo Messenger
with Zfone
panamalaworg
is our yahoo name, click here for instructions
or use our
encrypted email system
Executive Summary - As we have been explaining for almost two months Panama will have to concede to change its banking laws for the sake of the OECD. To not do so would mean blacklisting by the other 81 nations in the OECD. Blacklisting could mean the end of being able to have a correspondent bank in any country thus crippling the ability of Panama banks to be able to send and receive wires. They would also not be able to cash checks written from abroad. Panama is way too small to be a lone wolf.
This came from an official statement made by the Vice Minister of the Economy, Mr. Frank DeLima. Mr. DeLima did say that Panama could no longer risk being blacklisted or subject to sanctions by the other 81 members of the OECD. The idea of modeling the treaties that the Swiss have signed was mentioned.
Frederico Humbert, president of Banco General said that the impact of the OECD pressure would make it irresponsible not to take appropriate actions. He did say Banco General was tightening their own requirements already.
Do Not Shoot the Messenger – We are passing the news on to you as it develops. Anticipating these developments we moved to Guatemala. We are on your side and are not causing the loss of banking privacy. We are trying to help with solutions instead.
Comments From Other Law Firms – In order to repute denials one is likely to hear please check this out for yourself in the English Edition of La Prensa, a major Panama Newspaper:
Click the following links to read the full articles on prensa.com:
La Prensa: Panama yields to pressure concerning its lax banking laws
Panama faces pressure from OECD
Banking industry prepares to open up its books
|
Click Pics to enlarge. Screenshots taken from |
|
Implications – Do not be deceived. These new tax laws are extremely likely to cause capital flight from the tax havens (plural, all of them). Think about it. Sudden capital flight can cause banks in any jurisdiction to become illiquid. This can mean bank failures and liquidations. If you keep reading you will see that we no longer put our clients into any tax haven country.
What to Do – First off all move funds out of these tax haven jurisdictions before any treaty is signed. Wire out the lions share of your money fast. Then close the bank account. Do all of this BEFORE any tax treaty is signed or entered into. If you wait you run the risk of wiring out most of your money or closing your account as being treated as a suspicious transaction and having the funds frozen pending an investigation. This could take a long time. If the account is CLOSED BEFORE the treaty start date, the bank account should not be covered by the new treaty and the records would remain under the old bank secrecy laws. To not do so would make the new tax treaty a retroactive law and most countries have a constitution that forbids any retroactive laws.
Banking Privacy Solution – The game has changed. It is no longer a question of which country to go to. All the countries are signing these tax treaties for extremely loose information sharing. It is now a question of how to bank privately and securely. The answer is to use trust agreement banking where the bank does not know who you are. The law firm signs on the bank account. The law firm lawyers are from countries that do not tax offshore income so any queries would be unlikely. No nation would be trying to collect any taxes from such a person. You get a general power of attorney for the corporation in blank or made out to whomever you wish. You also have an international trust agreement with the law firm to protect you with. You can have the online banking pass codes. You can get a Visa card tied to the account. We do the banking in Ecuador, Guatemala, Costa Rica and Mexico.
For more information go here:
Guatemala Trust Agreement Banking
Implications – Watch these events carefully. These new tax laws in our opinion are extremely likely to cause capital flight from the offshore tax havens (plural, all of them not any one jurisdiction in particular). Think about it! Sudden capital flight can cause banks in any jurisdiction to become illiquid. This is a basic tenet of banking to be found in any banking textbook. This could possibly mean bank failures and liquidations. We have no crystal ball and cannot predict the future but in our opinion one should be on the lookout for such occurrences in any offshore tax haven jurisdiction they are banking in. If you keep reading you will see that we no longer put our clients into any tax haven country. Please not we are not singling out any specific jurisdiction(s). We are also just giving our opinions regarding the implications of these new tax treaties.
What to Do – In our opinion this is what we recommend. First of all move funds out of any offshore tax haven jurisdictions before any treaty is signed. Wire out the lions share of your money. Then close the bank account. Do all of this BEFORE any tax treaty is signed or entered into. If you wait you run the risk that wiring out most of your money or closing your account as being treated as a suspicious transaction and having the funds frozen pending an investigation. If the account is CLOSED BEFORE the treaty start date, the bank account should not be covered by the new treaty and the records would remain under the old bank secrecy laws. For a jurisdiction to not do so would make the new tax treaty a retroactive law and most countries have a constitution that forbids any retroactive laws. Once again just our opinions.
Questions welcome always.
![]() |
||||||
|
*Offshore Legal Associates Law Firm.We have no legal ties or associations with any other law firm or corporation with similar or like sounding names anywhere and should not be so confused with any other entity having a similar or like sounding name.